Radiometric dating problems

Radiometric dating problems

radiometric dating problems

Radiometric dating of rocks and minerals using naturally occurring, long-lived radioactive isotopes is troublesome for young-earth creationists because the techniques have provided overwhelming evidence of the antiquity of the earth and life. The way it really is: little-known facts about radiometric dating Long-age geologists will not accept a radiometric date unless it matches their pre-existing expectations. This document discusses the way radiometric dating and stratigraphic principles are used to establish the conventional geological time scale.

Radiometric dating problems. Dating Methods | Answers in Genesis

radiometric dating problems Carbon 14 Dating Problems - Nuclear Chemistry & Radioactive Decay

Radiometric dating problems -

Thus even the existence of correlations is not conclusive evidence that a date is correct. If you already have an account, Sign in. If any C14 date has ever yielded a value over 30, years, this implies that such contamination is not ubiquitous. Many accept radiometric dating methods as proof that the earth is millions of years old, in contrast to the biblical timeline. We cannot be impressed by numbers of supposed bad dates in the low tens; they represent a tiny fraction of the reported results, and in both creationist and non-creationist papers on potential problems with the method represent only the "anomalous" values collected from a much larger body of data. If the isochron line has a distinctly non-zero slope, and a fairly large number of data points, the nearly inevitable result of contamination failure of the system to remain closed will be that the fit of the data to a line will be destroyed. For example, the rubidium-strontium method would give a valid isotopic age of the biotite sample with inherited argon. All radiometric dating methods require, in order to produce accurate ages, certain initial conditions and lack of contamination over time. Thus these ages, though they generally have a considerable scatter, are not considered radiometric dating problems anomalies. However, it does not seem likely that sedimentary rocks would be this hot very often, except near lava or magma flows. Indeed, there are a number of conditions on the reliability of radiometric dating.

ultrathin

2 Comments

dispetcher

Creationists seem to think that a few examples of incorrect radiometric ages invalidate all of the results of radiometric dating, but such a conclusion is illogical. I mentioned a number of possibilities that could cause K-Ar dates to be much older than the true ages of the rocks.

© 2018 hidrocefalia.alphania.es